Mo

Use PubMed or Google Scholar filters, confirm in Ulrichsweb or Cabells, then verify a clear peer-review policy on the journal site and scan recent issues. Finding a peer-reviewed health journal doesn’t have to feel like a maze. With a few reliable tools and a quick verification routine, you can spot solid titles for reading or […]

Check the journal’s peer-review policy, confirm “received/accepted” dates in the article, and verify the journal in trusted catalogs like MEDLINE. Medical claims move people. A fast, clean way to check whether a paper passed peer review keeps you safe from shaky content and helps you cite with confidence. This guide gives you a repeatable method

Rate each included study with a validated tool, use two independent reviewers, justify every judgment, and show how ratings shape your synthesis. Doing Quality Assessment In A Systematic Review: The Core Workflow Quality assessment tells readers whether study results are likely to be trustworthy. Many teams use the phrase “risk of bias,” which points to

Create a piloted form, train two extractors, record study and outcome data, double-check entries, resolve conflicts, and document every rule. Data extraction turns search results into analyzable evidence. Done well, it produces a tidy dataset that mirrors the studies without losing nuance. This guide gives you a clear method you can repeat across teams. What

Add NOT review[pt] (and often NOT systematic[sb] and NOT meta-analysis[pt]) or use Article Type filters to remove review articles from PubMed results. This guide shows the fastest ways to strip review articles from PubMed so you can scan original research with far less noise. You’ll learn keyboard-friendly search tags, safe filter paths, and reliable patterns

Yes. Define a clear question, search widely, chart data, and report with PRISMA-ScR using a public protocol. Scoping reviews map what exists, show where knowledge is clustered, and signal gaps that merit deeper study or a later systematic review. In medicine, teams use this approach to size a field, clarify terms, catalog study designs, and

Plan a clear question, write a short protocol, run a broad search, screen in pairs, chart data, and map findings with PRISMA-ScR reporting. Scope at a glance Here is a compact road map you can use from day one. Stage Main output Practical tip Question PCC sentence and sub-questions Write one line for each element

Yes. Plan a question, gather studies, extract data, assess bias, pool effect sizes, probe heterogeneity, test stability, and report with PRISMA. Meta-analysis turns a stack of studies into one clear estimate, so your literature review moves from a summary to a numeric answer with transparent steps that anyone can check. Doing A Meta-Analysis For A

Plan outcomes, choose a compatible model, and combine study estimates or use a transparent narrative when meta-analysis isn’t suitable. Data synthesis turns scattered study results into a clear, decision-ready picture. Done well, it answers the review question, shows how stable the answer is, and makes the path from raw numbers to pooled findings traceable. This

Use trusted databases like PubMed, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library; apply filters, MeSH terms, and Boolean logic; then verify the journal’s status. What counts as peer review Peer review is the checkpoint between a manuscript and a published paper. Editors send a submission to qualified reviewers. Those reviewers read the study, spot gaps, and request