No, not every scholarly article is peer reviewed; review status varies by journal, article type, and stage in the publication cycle.

No, so-called Rhino pills lack proven benefits and often contain hidden drug ingredients, raising safety risks.

Yes, peer-reviewed review articles are recognized publications and usually count in academic records.

Yes, review articles include a methods section that describes how evidence was found, selected, and synthesized.

Yes, most review manuscripts include an abstract, with structured formats common for systematic reviews and scoping reviews.

Most reviews of raspberry ketones report weak human evidence for weight loss, and blend trials don’t show a clear solo effect.

Often, no—minor post-review changes are checked by the editor, unless a point needs expert confirmation.

No, magnetic rings show weak evidence for pain or weight loss; trial results match placebo, and safety limits apply to this topic.

No, magnetic earrings for weight loss lack solid evidence; small ear-point trials show weak, low-quality effects at best.

No, lymphatic earring claims lack clinical proof; use standard care for swelling and see a clinician if symptoms persist.