Yes, a medical review can cite earlier reviews for context, but data should come from primary studies unless you’re writing an overview of reviews.

Yes, you can publish a medical review as an independent author if you follow journal rules, ethics, and accepted reporting standards.

Yes, you can publish a medical review article if it’s original, transparent, and meets journal ethics and reporting standards.

Yes, you can cite review papers in a medical literature review, but lean on primary studies for evidence and use reviews with care.

Yes, you can cite non-peer-reviewed sources in a medical literature review when you label them clearly and appraise their quality.

Yes, you can cite review articles in a medical literature review, but rely on primary studies for key claims and use reviews for scope and methods.

Yes, you can decline a medicines review; consent is required except in emergencies or when laws allow limited overrides.

Yes, peer-review contributions fit on a medical CV when listed under Editorial Activities or Peer Review Service with journal names and dates.

Yes, systematic studies can be cited within a literature review when used as secondary evidence and clearly labeled.

Yes, figures can appear in a literature review when they add clarity, follow the journal style, and carry full captions with sources.