Guide

Build hands-on proof by taking chart-review tasks where you are, cross-training with UM teams, and stacking short projects, temp gigs, or certifications. Utilization review (UR) checks whether care is medically necessary and delivered at the right level. It shows up in prior authorization, concurrent review, and discharge planning. Health plans, hospitals, third-party administrators, and pharmacy […]

Yes—use open access platforms, library routes, author copies, and legal tools like Unpaywall; when needed, ask libraries for interlibrary loan.

Yes—there isn’t one universal UR license; most candidates earn HCQM or CPHQ, or a case-management credential like CCM/ACM, plus InterQual or MCG training. Getting Certified In Utilization Review: A Practical Path Utilization review sits at the intersection of quality, coverage, and care delivery. Hiring teams look for a credible credential, hands-on review skills, and working

Editors find strong reviewers by mining recent authors, ORCID and databases, screening conflicts, and inviting a balanced, conflict-free panel. Speed matters, but fit matters. The right peer reviewers bring sharp subject knowledge, sound methods, and a clean conflict record. This guide shows repeatable steps editors and authors can use to build a reliable shortlist fast,

Use Editorial Manager’s Find Reviewers (Scopus-powered), apply conflict checks, and invite 2–3 balanced experts with clear deadlines. What Editors Need From Reviewers Editors want timely, fair, topic-literate feedback that improves a paper and helps a decision. Good matches rely on subject fit, methods fluency, workload, and clean conflicts. Clear invites, tight timelines, and polite reminders

Yes—submit to a suitable journal with a clean manuscript, follow its instructions, and respond clearly to editor and reviewer requests. Peer review is a gate where editors send your work to experts for a quality and relevance check. Getting through that gate starts long before you click submit. The path is simple in outline: pick

Use citation maps, journal databases, ORCID, and editor tools to shortlist experts with no conflicts, then invite with a clear, time-bound ask. Finding the right minds for a manuscript is a skill you can build. Editors want fit, fairness, and speed. Authors want sharp feedback and a smooth path. This guide shows how to source,

Yes — use targeted database filters and a few smart search moves to locate review papers and post-publication critiques of any journal article. Searching for “reviews” can mean two different goals. Sometimes you want a review article that maps the state of knowledge on a topic. Other times you need critiques of one specific paper,

Yes. Start with your references, use journal and society databases, search ORCID, and invite conflict-free experts with a concise, personalized email. Editors and conference chairs look for fast, fair peer review. Authors are often asked to suggest names as part of a submission. Doing this well protects your paper, speeds decisions, and builds trust. This

Pick a journal, match scope, follow author instructions, use checklists, polish, submit, answer reviewers with evidence. Publishing in a peer-reviewed journal isn’t a mystery. It’s a sequence of clear moves that any careful researcher can run. This guide lays out each step, from picking the right venue to writing a response that lands acceptance. You’ll