Guide

Yes—create a Reviewer Hub profile, link Scopus, choose fit journals, complete peer-review training, then accept suitable invitations in Editorial Manager. Want to review manuscripts for Elsevier’s medical journals? You can. Editors look for clear expertise, reliable communication, and clean ethics. This guide shows you how to present those strengths, where to register, and what to […]

Start with a precise question, build a concept grid, run database-specific queries, check with PRESS, and report with PRISMA-S. Great reviews stand on the strength of their search and planning. A clear plan lets you find the right studies, avoid blind spots, and keep the work reproducible. The steps below show a simple way to

Peer review status shows on the journal’s site; confirm it in Ulrichsweb or DOAJ, and look for Web of Science or Scopus listings for extra assurance. Trying to figure out whether a journal is peer-reviewed can feel murky the first time. Here’s a clear playbook. You’ll learn what to check on the journal’s site, which

Map a clear question, register a protocol, search widely, screen with criteria, extract and appraise, synthesize, and report with PRISMA. Start With A Sharp Health Question Good reviews start with a tight, testable question. Use a structure that keeps the topic narrow and measurable. Define the population, the exposure or intervention, the comparator, and the

Yes: build subject proof, complete peer-review training, set up reviewer profiles, and volunteer on publisher portals to start receiving invitations. Editors invite reviewers who can judge methods, interpret data, and write clear feedback on time. You don’t need a single magic credential across every title, yet you do need visible expertise in a medical niche

Start with the question, match methods to it, check bias and stats, test the results against limitations, and judge real-world relevance and ethics. Reading a medical paper can feel like sprinting through mazes. With the right routine you can move fast today, stay fair, and spot value without missing hidden traps. This guide gives you

Draft a protocol, run a structured search, screen and appraise studies, synthesize results, and write to PRISMA and ICMJE rules with open methods. Writing a medical review paper feels big only until you break it into clear moves and habits. This guide walks you from idea to submission with steps you can reuse on every

Pick a question, pre-register a protocol, search widely, screen in pairs, extract carefully, appraise quality, synthesize, and report with PRISMA. Writing a medical review article isn’t a mystery. With a clear plan, a tidy workflow, and a small, well-coordinated team, you can produce a paper that experts trust and newcomers can follow. This guide keeps

Start with a PICO question, register a protocol, search widely, screen in pairs, extract and appraise, synthesize, and report with PRISMA 2020. Doing A Systematic Review In Medicine: Step-By-Step Define The Question (PICO Or PEO) Pick one well framed question. Use PICO for interventions: Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome. For prognosis or etiology, PEO works: Population,

State the review type, data sources, search steps, selection, extraction, bias checks, and synthesis plan so another team could repeat your work. Introduction A methods section tells readers exactly how the review found, filtered, and combined evidence. Clarity helps peers trust results and lets others repeat the process. The outline below keeps wording tight while