Yes, citing review articles is acceptable when you need overview, but use original studies for specific claims.

Yes, you can cite a review article for its synthesis; cite the original studies when you use their specific data or quotes.

Yes, you can cite a paper under review, but prefer a public preprint or label it transparently by status.

Yes, citing a review article within your own review is allowed, but treat it as a secondary source and balance it with primary studies.

Yes, you can cite a literature review, but favor original sources for claims and use reviews for scope, methods, and gaps.

Yes, chart review is billable when it meets code rules—same-day E/M time, approved prolonged or consult codes, or care-management programs.

Yes, SSDI can stop after a non-medical review when eligibility rules are broken or you don’t respond.

Yes, a literature review can include guiding questions that frame scope, synthesis, and gaps—avoid chatty rhetorical Qs.

Yes, a systematic review can include other systematic reviews when run as an overview (umbrella review) with safeguards for overlap and quality.

Yes, qualitative systematic reviews synthesize insights from qualitative studies with transparent, reproducible methods.