No, patents in medicine are not peer-reviewed; they are examined by patent offices for legal standards, not scientific merit.

No—white papers in healthcare are usually not peer-reviewed; journals handle formal peer review, not most white papers.

Yes, some public health reports are peer-reviewed; many others use editorial or agency clearance instead.

No, medical encyclopedias are usually expert-edited and medically reviewed, not peer-reviewed like journal articles.

Yes, most medical journals use peer review, but some medical periodicals—like news magazines and newsletters—do not.

Yes, many proceedings in medicine are peer-reviewed, but policies vary by venue and format.

No, in medicine most conference proceedings aren’t fully peer-reviewed; abstracts get committee screening, while some journal supplements use full peer review.

Yes, most medical conference submissions get committee peer review of abstracts, but it’s lighter than full journal peer review.

Many medical conferences screen abstracts with peer review, but standards and depth vary by meeting and field.

Often, but not always—peer review of medical monographs depends on the type, publisher, and purpose.