Guide

Yes—there isn’t one universal UR license; most candidates earn HCQM or CPHQ, or a case-management credential like CCM/ACM, plus InterQual or MCG training. Getting Certified In Utilization Review: A Practical Path Utilization review sits at the intersection of quality, coverage, and care delivery. Hiring teams look for a credible credential, hands-on review skills, and working […]

Editors find strong reviewers by mining recent authors, ORCID and databases, screening conflicts, and inviting a balanced, conflict-free panel. Speed matters, but fit matters. The right peer reviewers bring sharp subject knowledge, sound methods, and a clean conflict record. This guide shows repeatable steps editors and authors can use to build a reliable shortlist fast,

Use Editorial Manager’s Find Reviewers (Scopus-powered), apply conflict checks, and invite 2–3 balanced experts with clear deadlines. What Editors Need From Reviewers Editors want timely, fair, topic-literate feedback that improves a paper and helps a decision. Good matches rely on subject fit, methods fluency, workload, and clean conflicts. Clear invites, tight timelines, and polite reminders

Yes—submit to a suitable journal with a clean manuscript, follow its instructions, and respond clearly to editor and reviewer requests. Peer review is a gate where editors send your work to experts for a quality and relevance check. Getting through that gate starts long before you click submit. The path is simple in outline: pick

Use citation maps, journal databases, ORCID, and editor tools to shortlist experts with no conflicts, then invite with a clear, time-bound ask. Finding the right minds for a manuscript is a skill you can build. Editors want fit, fairness, and speed. Authors want sharp feedback and a smooth path. This guide shows how to source,

Yes — use targeted database filters and a few smart search moves to locate review papers and post-publication critiques of any journal article. Searching for “reviews” can mean two different goals. Sometimes you want a review article that maps the state of knowledge on a topic. Other times you need critiques of one specific paper,

Yes. Start with your references, use journal and society databases, search ORCID, and invite conflict-free experts with a concise, personalized email. Editors and conference chairs look for fast, fair peer review. Authors are often asked to suggest names as part of a submission. Doing this well protects your paper, speeds decisions, and builds trust. This

Pick a journal, match scope, follow author instructions, use checklists, polish, submit, answer reviewers with evidence. Publishing in a peer-reviewed journal isn’t a mystery. It’s a sequence of clear moves that any careful researcher can run. This guide lays out each step, from picking the right venue to writing a response that lands acceptance. You’ll

Scan your sources, code repeated ideas, group patterns, and test each cluster against evidence until stable, well-named themes emerge. Finding themes turns a reading list into a clear story. A theme is more than a topic; it’s a pattern of meaning across sources that answers your question and guides your structure. The goal is a

The literature review usually sits in the introduction or a clearly labeled section like “Literature Review” or “Related Work”; scan headings and citation-dense pages to spot it fast. Need to jump straight to the literature review in a research article? Here’s a reliable way to spot it without guesswork. The trick is to look for