Guide

Use Google Scholar filters, search operators, and journal checks; there’s no one-click peer-reviewed toggle, so verify the journal’s review policy. Google Scholar is a fast way to reach scholarly work across journals, repositories, and universities. Getting only peer-reviewed studies takes a bit of setup and a smart workflow. This guide shows you how to do […]

Find peer-reviewed work on Google Scholar by using Advanced Search, checking the journal’s page, and verifying the title in trusted indexes. You can pull solid academic sources from Google Scholar in minutes if you know a few practical moves. This guide keeps things simple and precise: build a clean query, filter the results that matter,

Google Scholar has no “peer-reviewed only” toggle; use the detailed search form, journal checks, and trusted indexes to narrow to peer-reviewed work. You want solid research fast. This guide shows practical Scholar moves that keep low-value hits out and bring journal articles that passed editorial review to the top. What You Can And Can’t Filter

Read twice, check ethics and methods, verify reporting via CONSORT/PRISMA/STROBE, give evidence-based comments, and suggest a clear decision. Peer review keeps medical science honest, clear, and useful. A tight process helps editors, helps authors, and protects patients who rely on published work. This guide gives you a clean, repeatable way to review any clinical, public

Check scope and ethics, review methods and results, judge novelty and clarity, then send structured comments with a clear accept-revise-reject call. Peer review shapes what reaches clinicians and patients, so a careful, fair read matters. This guide shows a clean way to work from first contact to final recommendation, with practical checks, plain language, and

Start with the journal’s instructions, check reporting checklists, test the methods and ethics, then send a clear, structured report with firm actions. What Editors Expect From A Medical Peer Review Editors want a fast yes or no on feasibility, followed by a fair read. The review should check fit, rigor, clarity, and ethics. It should

Use PubMed with article-type filters, check the journal’s MEDLINE status, then verify peer-review notes, author disclosures, and study design. When you need medical facts that stand up to scrutiny, peer-reviewed sources are your safest bet. This guide shows you how to spot them quickly, search smarter, and judge quality with confidence. You’ll use free tools,

Check the journal’s peer-review policy, confirm “refereed” status in Ulrich’s or DOAJ, verify the article type, and look for accepted dates. You need a clear way to tell whether a paper went through peer review. The steps below work across fields, save time, and cut guesswork. The goal is simple: confirm the journal runs peer

Plan the question, map terms, blend MeSH with keywords, use Boolean logic, track history, keep limits light, and document everything for PRISMA-S. Done right, a PubMed strategy finds the right studies without bloat. This guide walks you through a clean, repeatable build that suits clinical topics and stays true to librarian-tested methods. Doing a PubMed

Use title operators and negative terms (e.g., -intitle:”review” and -(“systematic review” OR “meta-analysis”)), apply year filters, and avoid review-only journals; Scholar has no one-click exclude switch. Exclude Review Articles In Google Scholar Results: Fast Methods Google Scholar can show a “Review articles” option in the sidebar, yet there isn’t a built-in switch that removes reviews